关于AI你需要知道的五件事

Skip to Content

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

At SXSW London last week I gave a talk called “Five things you need to know about AI,” in which I shared what I think are the biggest themes in AI right now.

I pulled a few things from our first AI10 list, an annualguide to the most important trends in this buzzy world, but I also veered off on a number of tangents. In my half-hour slot, I tried to cover the key talking points that I think help to make sense of what’s going on in tech—and thus the economy—today.

(I gave atalk with the same title at SXSW London last yearwith five _different_ things you needed to know. A lot has happened since then!)

So: This is how I’m thinking about AI midway through 2026. Let me know if you would pick different points!

content frame

An error has occurred

🛠️ The July/August issue is LIVE! Subscribe to unlock reporting on AI, climate, and engineering. Plus, get bonus AI content.

1. Strictly speaking, I didn’t need to show up to give this talk.

Tongue in cheek? Maybe. But generative AI tools have already become mundane, used by millions to automate everyday office tasks (including producing anddelivering talks). It’s no surprise that one of the biggest questions out there right now iswhat this all means for jobs. People are confused and scared.

The frustrating answer is that despite thehype coming from the topabout the potential for AI to join the workforce soon—and viral social media posts yelling that something big is happening—there is almost no data to say either way what kind of effect this technology will have on employment and the economy overall. That’s not to say it won’t have an impact, even a huge one, but it’s just too soon to tell.

In theory,teams of agents working together toward common goalscould become assembly lines for white-collar work, doing to offices this century what Henry Ford’s innovations did to factories in the 20th century.

In theory. Because in order to know what will happen to jobs, we need to know what will happen inside the companies that create those jobs. Butmost companies are still figuring that out.

2. AI is getting scary (for real this time).

There have beenscary stories about AIfor years—claims that it willkill us allor bring about the end of civilization. There’s still aloud crowd of doomers, but those scenarios remain dystopian science fiction.

What’s happened instead is that many of the worst near-term, real-world fears have come true.

Take deepfakes, AI-generated images or videos of people doing things they didn’t actually do. Deepfakes have been used to incite violence, swing votes, and sow distrust. Trump’s White House is among those creating and publishing fake images.

Many deepfakes are also used to abuse women and girls. One study found that 98% of deepfakes are pornographic and 99% involve women.

Another concern is the rise of dangerous and delusional relationships with chatbots. Many people turn to chatbots to seek private advice and to feel heard. But there are now multiple lawsuits against AI companies alleging that the technology encouraged or aided suicides and other forms of self-harm.

AI is also beingused in warfare in new and worrying ways. LLMs are now giving advice, not just being used for analysis. One US defense official told my colleague James O’Donnell that you could now give a military chatbot a list of targets and ask which one to hit first. Anyone who uses AI knows that its output needs to be reviewed carefully. In fact-paced, high-stress active conflict, the risk that corners get cut is high.

content frame

An error has occurred


New issue release + bonus AI content

Subscribe to access our latest issue and discover the breakthroughs shaping AI, climate, and modern engineering.

CLAIM OFFER

3. A lot of people really hate AI.

I checked out ananti-AI protest in Londonearlier this year and found a very broad mix of complaints. Banners proclaiming the end times bounced along to chants of “Stop the slop! Stop the slop!” Protests are getting more organized and drawing larger crowds.

There’s pushback from fans of films and video games, who object to the use of generative AI in their favorite titles. In one notable case, the acclaimed 2025 game Clair Obscur wasstripped of an awardwhen the developers admitted to using AI in just one small, specific part of its production.

And there’s the data center backlash. The US has more than 5,400 data centers and counting. With the energy demands of AI growing, people are unhappy about the environmental impact and their rising electricity bills. Activists are managing to stall development in a number of places.

Regulation is becoming politically popular. Grassroots movements likeQuitGPThave gained momentum. A small number have turned to violence; a few weeks ago somebody threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s house. It’s not clear where all this leads. But the apocalyptic hype from tech leaders is not helping people stay calm.

4. AI for science is a very big deal.

It’s early days yet, but the potential for AI to help make a genuine and important scientific discovery is greater than ever.

Google DeepMind has developed Co-Scientist, a multipurpose tool that can help researchers dig up and compare previous results, generate hypotheses, and devise experiments to test them. OpenAI told me this year that itsNorth Star is the goal of building a fully automated researcherby 2028.

Mathematicians are excited too. Fundamental math underpins many everyday technologies, from internet security to video streaming. The last few months have seen a string of claims that AI has cracked unsolved math problems. And software that can solve really hard math problems will be able—so the argument goes—to solve more general-purpose real-world problems too.

What are the downsides? Some scientists are warning that an overreliance on AI tools could narrow the scope of research because scientists may choose problems that are most suited to AI assistance. There are also concerns that AI-assisted research will lead to a flood of inaccurate or fake results: science slop.

5. AI is everywhere all at once.

So where does that leave us? There are a lot of exciting things, a lot of worrying things, and a lot of hot air. It can be exhausting to keep up, and yetit all feels inescapable. Some people will tell you we’re in a race to the top; some will tell you we’re in a race to the bottom. But it’s really not clear where we’re headed.

AI companies want us to march to their tune and buy into thepropaganda about artificial general intelligence,whatever that means. They are selling a vision that feels inevitable, but it isn’t.

content frame

An error has occurred


Inspire new innovations this year

Empower the tech enthusiast on your list this year with access to expert technology news & insights.Give today »

GIVE A GIFT

We’ve built atechnology that can do humanlike things, and I think that makes it hard to get our heads around the fact that it is still just a technology.

Something is happening. Maybe even something comparable to the invention of electricity or the internet. But technologies like that take time to settle and bring lasting change.

Get ready for a marathon, not a sprint.

_This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first,sign up here._

hide

Deep Dive

Artificial intelligence

A startup claims it broke through a bottleneck that’s holding back LLMs

Subquadratic has now shared more details about its new model. But some are still skeptical.

By

• Will Douglas Heavenarchive page

Musk v. Altman week 1: Elon Musk says he was duped, warns AI could kill us all, and admits that xAI distills OpenAI’s models

Musk kept his cool, and OpenAI’s lawyer bulldozed him with piercing questions about his motivations for suing the company.

By

• Michelle Kimarchive page

A reality check on the AI jobs hysteria

What do the numbers really say about the impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market? The answer might surprise you.

By

• David Rotmanarchive page

Anthropic’s Code with Claude showed off coding’s future—whether you like it or not

As tools like Claude Code get better, more and more developers are happy to hand off coding tasks to them. The way software gets built has changed for good.

By

• Will Douglas Heavenarchive page

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Enter your email

Privacy Policy

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at [customer-service@technologyreview.com](mailto:customer-service@technologyreview.com) with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.

content frame

An error has occurred

This is your first complimentary story

Explore emerging technology with an MIT Technology Review subscription.

SUBSCRIBE TODAYSign in

content frame

An error has occurred

Don't leave yet!

Save 25% + get bonus AI content

Subscribe to explore how engineering challenges are pushing the boundaries of human innovation in our new issue.

CLAIM 25% OFF

content frame